Talk:Most Impressive Performances of 2010

Having the separate "Most Impressive"/"Most Disappointing" pages for the four-way contests made sense, because you could have one character exceed expectations by 11% and the other three only underperforming by 4%, 3.5%, and 3.5%, to use simple numbers. In 1v1s, one character's overperformance is guaranteed to be exactly equal to the other character's underperformance. I don't think we really need the "Most Disappointing Performances of 2010" page. We don't have one, but there's a redlink to it on the Winter 2010 Contest page, and that's an edit-locked page so I can't remove the redlink myself.Spirit Tsunami 20:57, October 29, 2010 (UTC)